I have always had a strong interest in technology, so much so that people often wonder why I became an accountant. Well I need to admit that it was a hard choice, here are the three reasons I chose working in accounting over working in IT.

Stability

Technology changes at a rapid pace. While this is a boon to consumers, it does pose a certain challenge for those working closely with it. It can be tricky to identify emerging technologies which will last long, and unless one keeps updating their knowledge it can quickly become obsolete. Accounting has a far more stable knowledge bas which ensures that I won't ever be left behind.

Culture

Today's companies are predominately run by accountants, not technologists. Consequently it is not uncommon for IT to be viewed as just another cost, and like all costs; one which should be reduced as much as possible. More and more companies are catching on to the strategic importance of IT, but in my opinion we still have a long way to go. Accountants are still perceived by many to be more of a necessity than technologists.

The Joy of IT

I've always enjoyed working with technology; however, I learned in university that my enjoyment was predicated on doing what I wanted to do. Writing code for a project of mine is fun, but writing code for someone else is nothing short of odious. One reason I decided to avoid working in IT was to keep a distinction between work and play, so that what I do on my own time is different (and hopefully more enjoyable) than what I do to earn a living.

Move over Pirate Party, there’s a new single-issue political party.

Many people dislike PowerPoint, Microsoft's ubiquitous application for creating business presentations, but few would take a political stand over it. However, that's exactly what Switzerland's Anti-PowerPoint Party (APPP) seeks to do...

According to the APPP, the use of presentation software costs the Swiss economy 2.1 billion Swiss francs (US$2.5 billion) annually, while across the whole of Europe, presentation software causes an economic loss of €110 billion (US$160 billion). APPP bases its calculations on unverified assumptions about the number of employees attending presentations each week, and supposes that 85 percent of those employees see no purpose in the presentations.

From CIO

If this party existed in Canada, I’d become a card carrying member.

A while ago I stumbled upon RFC 1925 - The Twelve Networking Truths. In the world of RFCs there are several types. There are serious RFCs, humourous RFCs, and then there is RFC 1925.

RFC 1925 is best described as transcendental. It manages not only to apply to networking, but also accounting, financial analysis and a number of other fields and topics. Consequently when I first read it, I printed it and posted it on the walls of my desks (yes, both of them). Nothing it says is groundbreaking, but it is an excellent reminder of how good work is done.

In fact, I think so highly of it that I have decided to inflict it on you share it with you. Below is the full text of the RFC and attached at the very bottom is a cleaned up version which is good for printing.

Network Working Group
Request for Comments: 1925
Category: Informational

R. Callon, Editor
IOOF
1 April 1996

The Twelve Networking Truths

Status of this Memo

This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

This memo documents the fundamental truths of networking for the Internet community. This memo does not specify a standard, except in the sense that all standards must implicitly follow the fundamental truths.

Acknowledgments

The truths described in this memo result from extensive study over an extended period of time by many people, some of whom did not intend to contribute to this work. The editor merely has collected these truths, and would like to thank the networking community for originally illuminating these truths.

1. Introduction

This Request for Comments (RFC) provides information about the fundamental truths underlying all networking. These truths apply to networking in general, and are not limited to TCP/IP, the Internet, or any other subset of the networking community.

2. The Fundamental Truths

1. It Has To Work.
   
   
2. No matter how hard you push and no matter what the priority, you can't increase the speed of light.
   
   
   1. (corollary). No matter how hard you try, you can't make a baby in much less than 9 months. Trying to speed this up *might* make it slower, but it won't make it happen any quicker.
      
      
3. With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead.
   
   
4. Some things in life can never be fully appreciated nor understood unless experienced firsthand. Some things in networking can never be fully understood by someone who neither builds commercial networking equipment nor runs an operational network.
   
   
5. It is always possible to aglutenate multiple separate problems into a single complex interdependent solution. In most cases this is a bad idea.
   
   
6. It is easier to move a problem around (for example, by moving the problem to a different part of the overall network architecture) than it is to solve it.
   
   
   1. (corollary). It is always possible to add another level of indirection.
      
      
7. It is always something
   
   
   1. (corollary). Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two (you can't have all three).
      
      
8. It is more complicated than you think.
   
   
9. For all resources, whatever it is, you need more.
   
   
   1. (corollary) Every networking problem always takes longer to solve than it seems like it should.
      
      
10. One size never fits all.
    
    
11. Every old idea will be proposed again with a different name and a different presentation, regardless of whether it works.
    
    
    1. (corollary). See rule 6a.
       
       
12. In protocol design, perfection has been reached not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
    
    

Security Considerations

This RFC raises no security issues. However, security protocols are subject to the fundamental networking truths.

References

The references have been deleted in order to protect the guilty and avoid enriching the lawyers.

Author's Address

Ross Callon
Internet Order of Old Farts
c/o Bay Networks
3 Federal Street
Billerica, MA 01821

Phone: 508-436-3936
EMail: rcallon@baynetworks.com

Jessica Hische has prepared an excellent flowchart to help you decide if you should offer your labour for free. It is geared towards those working in graphic design, but extends to other fields easily enough.

Ever been sitting at your desk and catch a smell of burning rubber, only to have the fire alarm go off a couple minutes later?

I guess it's just me.

Time to trudge down sixteen stories worth of stairs and spend my lunch at Starbucks.